Which is more terrible to be assimilated or excluded?(Full version of the debate)

In this topic,Which is more terrifying, assimilation or exclusion?Being excluded is even more terribleWhich is more terrifying, assimilation or exclusion?It's not good to be alone; there are old people wrestling on the roadWhich is more terrifying, assimilation or exclusion?The young man went to help hold him, but the old man said that the young man fell downWhich is more terrifying, assimilation or exclusion?He asked the young man to lose money, just as no other pedestrians saw him at the scene, the young man was in the wrong, so he paid for it. However, a camera on this road caught this scene, so it was exposed. The old man was instantly ostracized by others, and he would be said to be pointed at when he went there.

To sum up, being assimilated is more terrible than being excluded. It not only threatens the cultural foundation and mental health of individuals and groups, but may also destroy the diversity and creativity of society. Therefore, we should be alert to the risks of assimilation, strive to protect and inherit various cultural heritage, while promoting harmonious coexistence and exchanges and mutual learning between different cultures; It is best to first introduce what genetically modified organisms are. The benefits of genetically modified organisms should be explained from the potential harm of genetically modified organisms. For example, when genetically modified organisms are hybridized with ordinary organisms, it is certain that some genetically modified organisms are relatively competitive for survival. In this way, the number of species will be further reduced. Hybridization between organisms will be created, new species will be created, or species will be invaded. The harm of genetically modified organisms to humans will definitely be caused. Not yet.

This is the center for debate and summary. The center he proposed is undoubtedly sensational. Just as Teacher Luo Zhenyu said that in the process of growth, you will encounter good and bad things. You yourself have a process of constant acceptance and rejection. In this process, you will continue to grow, become complex, progress and get better. Sometimes you will even be assimilated into people you once hated and disliked. This "growth" is self-inflicted; The arguments of being excluded are even more terrifying. We have just demonstrated from the example of ordinary people encountering cannibals that exclusion is inherently harmful. The fundamental reason why we choose to assimilate is that we are afraid of being excluded. Therefore, we have also demonstrated from the example of pyramid schemes that in the process, when you are assimilated, you can choose whether to be assimilated or not, but exclusion cannot. From the perspective of the result, when things are already.

Third, from the perspective of development, picking up is a process from scratch. Before picking up, you don't own what you picked up. Picking up requires basing yourself on what is known now, seeing through the essence of things, and predicting the unknown future. After picking up, the changes and development of things are visible. When you need to let go, many things are known. Therefore, it is more difficult to pick up than to let go because there is a responsibility when you pick up.

Which is more terrifying, assimilation or exclusion? Full version of the debate?

1. However, without news value as a support, news ethics will be difficult to reflect its importance. A report lacking news value, even if it meets the moral standards, will be difficult to attract public attention and discussion, thus failing to achieve news communication effects and social influence. Force 4 News value and news ethics complement each other, but in this debate, news value is given higher priority. News value and news ethics are not mutually exclusive, but complement each other.

2. Competition does not exclude cooperation, and good cooperation promotes competition. In my country's economic life, there is a "win-win theory between turtles and rabbits." The turtles and rabbits competed many times. Each other won and lost. Later, the turtles and rabbits cooperated. The rabbits carried the turtles on their backs and ran to the river, and then the turtles carried the rabbits on their backs and swam across the river. This is a "win-win situation". Competitors can also be partners. As the saying goes,"one fence has three piles, and one hero has three gangs" wants to achieve something big. We must rely on the joint efforts of everyone to look at ancient and modern times, at home and abroad.

3. Cooperation is stronger than competition, but competition will always exist. Competition will exist where there is cooperation, and competition will also exist where there is competition. Competitors cannot exclude each other, causing both losses, but must promote each other and improve together. The "win-win" concept points out that "win-win is the most ideal result of competition. Good cooperation creates win-win results. We only need to be within the scope permitted by law and morality, and in accordance with equality, fairness and integrity.

4. Which is more terrible to be assimilated or excluded? The debate question___Mo Ran 20171115 Campus Life Debate Troubles Report Answer Lottery After answering the questions carefully for the first time, you can get 3 lucky draws. You can select 1 or more of the following keywords. You can also directly click on "Search Data" to search for the entire issue debate competition assimilation and exclusion search data local pictures.

For example, in the process of existence and development of life, assimilation and alienation are its fundamental contradictions. Once life ends, its fundamental contradiction will transform into the synthesis and decomposition of organic substances and chemical molecules. If life is only transformed into carbon dioxide or calcium carbonate, its fundamental contradiction will become The attraction and repulsion between molecules. In interpersonal relationships, forbearance may temporarily alleviate conflicts, but it may not completely solve the problem. Instead, it may lead to long-term accumulated grievances and face them frankly; It is precisely because there are too many scammers that no one cares even more. Yesterday, I saw another beggar on the street. He didn't beg. He was shirtless and carried a sack. He picked up food in the garbage bin. Others gave him money, but he didn't want it. He only wanted food. The owner of the cake shop gave him some bread, and he just squatted far away from the store to eat. He didn't dare to get close to people when he walked around. He was a little strong, and there were many people saying that he had health.

Throughout ancient and modern times, at home and abroad, not all people who have been successful in their careers are good at cooperating. Quoting which is more important? QuotCooperation and competition? QuotModern society, continuous progress due to competition and full of vitality due to competition. We believe that competition in modern society is more important than cooperation. You chase after each other and develop and competition can make backward become advanced. Society follows this eternal competition law to move towards modernity and towards the future. For individuals, the prerequisite of competition is that everyone can; Hello, the host said to everyone that after a wonderful and intense free debate, we now ask the students of the Opposition Four Debate to summarize their remarks and say to everyone that the Opposition Four Debate emphasized that cooperation is more important than competition in modern society. This is an exaggeration. We have no eternal enemies, but we have eternal national and national interests. To safeguard our interests, only competition is the most effective way. The coexistence of greatness and setbacks just shows that competition is more important than cooperation.

Everyone has heard the story that "the snipe and the clam fight, and the fisherman benefits". The snipe wants to peck the clam's meat, but the clam catches them. They compete with each other. Each has a hidden agenda, which gives the fishermen an opportunity to seize them both to seize the snipe and the clam just to pursue their own interests and compete with each other. What makes you even more ridiculous is that at the last moment, they are still unwilling to take a step back because of the competition. Competition cannot achieve the most benefits.